Journal of Business Ethics 17 (12):1281-1298 (1998)

We conduct quantitative and qualitative analysis of 33 cases of internal and external whistleblowers wrongfully fired for reporting wrongdoing. Our results show external whistleblowers have less tenure with the organization, greater evidence of wrongdoing, and they tend to be more effective in changing organizational practices. External whistleblowers also experience more extensive retaliation than internal whistleblowers, and patterns of retaliation by management against the whistleblower vary depending on whether the whistleblower reports internally or externally. We discuss implications for organizations and whistleblowers, and we conclude that researchers need to develop different theoretical explanations of internal and external whistleblowing processes.
Keywords Philosophy   Ethics   Business Education   Economic Growth   Management
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1005916210589
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Whistleblowing: The Reporter’s Role.Frederick A. Elliston - 1986 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 3 (2):25-36.
Blowing the Whistle on Minor, Less Serious Forms of Fraud.John P. Keenan - 1995 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 6:167-178.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 39 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
142 ( #81,140 of 2,498,161 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,161 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes