Single Payer Meets Managed Competition

Hastings Center Report 38 (1):23-33 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Common sense and empirical evidence suggest that single-payer health insurance, combined with competitive private delivery, would be the most cost-effective way of achieving the major, widely accepted goals of health care reform. Among the current presidential candidates, Kucinich and Gravel have the most promising reform proposals, with Edwards’s and Obama’s as fall-backs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Managed care: How economic incentive reforms went wrong.Madison Powers - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):353-360.
Trust in managed care organizations.Allen Buchanan - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (3):189-212.
The importance of management for understanding managed care.George G. J. Agich - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (5):518 – 534.
The ethical impacts of managed care.George W. Rimler & Richard D. Morrison - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (6):493 - 501.
Intensity of competition and the choice between product and process innovation.Giacomo Bonanno - 1998 - International Journal of Industrial Organization 16 (4):495-510.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-12

Downloads
19 (#796,059)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David DeGrazia
George Washington University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references