Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1135-1193 (2021)
AbstractThe term ‘responsible AI’ has been coined to denote AI that is fair and non-biased, transparent and explainable, secure and safe, privacy-proof, accountable, and to the benefit of mankind. Since 2016, a great many organizations have pledged allegiance to such principles. Amongst them are 24 AI companies that did so by posting a commitment of the kind on their website and/or by joining the ‘Partnership on AI’. By means of a comprehensive web search, two questions are addressed by this study: Did the signatory companies actually try to implement these principles in practice, and if so, how? What are their views on the role of other societal actors in steering AI towards the stated principles? It is concluded that some three of the largest amongst them have carried out valuable steps towards implementation, in particular by developing and open sourcing new software tools. To them, charges of mere ‘ethics washing’ do not apply. Moreover, some 10 companies from both the USA and Europe have publicly endorsed the position that apart from self-regulation, AI is in urgent need of governmental regulation. They mostly advocate focussing regulation on high-risk applications of AI, a policy which to them represents the sensible middle course between laissez-faire on the one hand and outright bans on technologies on the other. The future shaping of standards, ethical codes, and laws as a result of these regulatory efforts remains, of course, to be determined.
Similar books and articles
Responsible Innovation in Business.Katharina Jarmai, Adele Tharani & Caroline Nwafor - 2020 - In Responsible Innovation : Business Opportunities and Strategies for Implementation. Springer Verlag. pp. 7-17.
A Finnish study of self‐regulation discourses in the chemical industry's Responsible Care programme.Toivo Niskanen - 2012 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 21 (1):77-99.
How to make business ethics operational: Responsible care – an example of successful self-regulation? [REVIEW]Frauke Druckrey - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9-10):979-985.
Men in Groups: Collective Responsibility for Rape.Larry May & Robert Strikwerda - 1994 - Hypatia 9 (2):134 - 151.
The agents of justice.Colin Hickey, Tim Meijers, Ingrid Robeyns & Dick Timmer - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16.
Engaging Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Responsible Innovation.Catherine Flick, Malcolm Fisk & George Ogoh - 2020 - In Katharina Jarmai (ed.), Responsible Innovation : Business Opportunities and Strategies for Implementation. Springer Verlag. pp. 71-83.
Corporate Social Responsibility Boundaries.Celine Gainet - 2008 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:318-328.
Towards a Business Case for Responsible Innovation.Norma Schönherr, André Martinuzzi & Katharina Jarmai - 2020 - In Katharina Jarmai (ed.), Responsible Innovation : Business Opportunities and Strategies for Implementation. Springer Verlag. pp. 85-97.
Convergence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance in Weak Economies: The case of Bangladesh.Mia Mahmudur Rahim & Shawkat Alam - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 121 (4):1-14.
UN Principles for Responsible Investment Signatories and the Anti-Apartheid SRI Movement: A Thought Experiment. [REVIEW]Neil Stuart Eccles - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3):415 - 424.
Ethics in Responsible Investment: How to Incorporate Ethics into Investment Analysis.Shunsuke Sugimoto - 2018 - Revue Roumaine de Philosophie 62 (1):15-22.
Confronting Models of Regulation for Private Military Companies.Alexander Nikitin - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 5:51-56.
A vision of Responsible Innovation.Rene Von Schomberg - 2013 - In Richard Owen (ed.), Responsible Innovation. pp. 51-74.
Regulation Enables: Corporate Agency and Practices of Responsibility.Garrath Williams - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 154 (4):989-1002.
UN Global Compact and Code of Conduct: The Case of Turkey.Arzu Ozsozgun Caliskan - 2018 - In Jing Bian & Kıymet Tunca Çalıyurt (eds.), Regulations and Applications of Ethics in Business Practice. Springer Singapore. pp. 295-309.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Algorithmic decision-making employing profiling: will trade secrecy protection render the right to explanation toothless?Paul B. de Laat - 2022 - Ethics and Information Technology 24 (2).
AI, Suicide Prevention and the Limits of Beneficence.Bert Heinrichs & Aurélie Halsband - 2022 - Philosophy and Technology 35 (4):1-18.
The Switch, the Ladder, and the Matrix: Models for Classifying AI Systems.Jakob Mökander, Margi Sheth, David S. Watson & Luciano Floridi - forthcoming - Minds and Machines:1-28.
References found in this work
Translating principles into practices of digital ethics: five risks of being unethical.Luciano Floridi - 2019 - Philosophy and Technology 32 (2):185-193.