Metaphilosophy 48 (3):227-244 (2017)

Authors
Rogier De Langhe
Tilburg University
Eric Schliesser
University of Amsterdam
Abstract
This article addresses the question how philosophy should be evaluated in a research-grant funding environment. It offers a new conception of philosophy that is inclusive and builds on familiar elements of professional, philosophical practice. Philosophy systematically questions the questions we ask, the concepts we use, and the values we hold. Its product is therefore rarely conclusive but can be embodied in everything we do. This is typical of explorative research and differentiates it from exploitative research, which constitutes the bulk of funded research activity. This article argues that exploratory research is crucial for long-term progress and requires a distinct evaluative regime.
Keywords general purpose technologies  research evaluation  exploration  exploitation  research policy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/meta.12244
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,666
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Science, Truth, and Democracy.A. Bird - 2003 - Mind 112 (448):746-749.
Metaphysics as Modeling: The Handmaiden’s Tale.L. A. Paul - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (1):1-29.
Explanatory Unification.Philip Kitcher - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (4):507-531.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Nothing Much for Philosophers.Eric Schliesser - 2018 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (1):40-46.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Understanding Risks and Benefits in Research on Reproductive Genetic Technologies.Janet Malek - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (4):339 – 358.
Exploitation in Biomedical Research.David B. Resnik - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (3):233--259.
Sharing the Benefits of Research Fairly: Two Approaches.Joseph Millum - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (4):219-223.
Alive and Well: The Research Imperative.Rebecca Dresser - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):915-921.
Empirical Legal Research and Policy-Making.Martin Partington - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
Educational Research and Policy: Epistemological Considerations.David Bridges & Michael Watts - 2008 - Philosophy of Education 42 (Supplement s1):41-62.
Recent Questions in Responsible Conduct of Research.Levi Wood - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 14:1-12.
Educational Research and Policy: Epistemological Considerations.David Bridges & Michael Watts - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (s1):41-62.
Research Skills for the Future: A Consultant's Perspective.Richard J. Ormerod - 2013 - Journal of Research Practice 9 (1):Article V2.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-04-25

Total views
22 ( #452,951 of 2,349,372 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #330,956 of 2,349,372 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes