Partial Values: A Comparative Study in the Limits of Objectivity

Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield International (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An examination of the tensions between different conceptions of objectivity and subjectivity, and impartiality and partiality, as they arise in epistemology, ethical theory, and metaethics. Resources from classical Chinese philosophy are leveraged throughout the work to showcase new alternative ways of resolving these tensions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Bias Paradox.Deborah Heikes - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 154–155.
How Objectivity Matters.David Enoch - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 5:111-52.
Ethics and Science: Is Plausibility in the Eye of the Beholder?Allan Gibbard - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (4):737-749.
Moral partiality.Yong Li - 2023 - New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Objectivity in Law and Morals.Brian Leiter (ed.) - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Subjectivity and Objectivity in Biblical Exegesis.J. G. Davies - 1983 - John Rylands University Library of Manchester.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-04

Downloads
40 (#388,298)

6 months
16 (#217,114)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin DeLapp
Converse College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references