The myth of cartesian qualia

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (2):181-207 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The standard view of Cartesian sensations is that they present themselves as purely qualitative features of experience. Accordingly, Descartes view would be that in perceiving the color red, for example, we are merely experiencing the subjective feel of redness rather than seeming to perceive a property of bodies. In this paper, I establish that the argument and textual evidence offered in support of SV fail to prove that Descartes held this view. Indeed, I will argue that there are textual and theoretical reasons for believing that Descartes held the negation of SV. Qualia aren't Descartes legacy

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cartesian sensations.Raffaella De Rosa - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (5):780-792.
Descartes and the Puzzle of Sensory Representation.Raffaella De Rosa - 2009 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The Ontological Argument as an Exercise in Cartesian Therapy.Lawrence Nolan - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):521 - 562.
Descartes on Degrees of Freedom.C. P. Ragland - 2013 - Essays in Philosophy 14 (2):239-268.
Mathematics, Physics, and Corporeal Substance in Descartes.Gregory Brown - 1989 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70 (4):281.
Subjectivity in Descartes and Kant.Hubert Schwyzer - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (188):342-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
152 (#27,694)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Raffaella De Rosa
Rutgers University - Newark

Citations of this work

Cartesian Imperativism.Joseph Gottlieb & Saja Parvizian - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (4):702-725.
Against Passionate Epistemology.Saja Parvizian - 2023 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 40 (3):258-277.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references