- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why “sex as a biological variable” conflicts with precision medicine initiatives
Cell Reports Medicine 10050 (3):1-3 (2022)
Abstract
Policies that require male-female sex comparisons in all areas of biomedical research conflict with the goal of improving health outcomes through context-sensitive individualization of medical care. Sex, like race, requires a rigorous, contextual approach in precision medicine. A “sex contextualist” approach to gender-inclusive medicine better aligns with this aim.Author Profiles
My notes
Similar books and articles
Navigating conflicts of justice in the use of race and ethnicity in precision medicine.G. Owen Schaefer, Tai E. Shyong & Shirley Hsiao-Li Sun - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (8):849-856.
Big Data, precision medicine and private insurance: A delicate balancing act.Ine Van Hoyweghen, Effy Vayena & Alessandro Blasimme - 2019 - Big Data and Society 6 (1).
Perspectives in biological dynamics and theoretical medicine.Stephen H. Koslow, Arnold J. Mandell & Michael F. Shlesinger (eds.) - 1987 - New York, N.Y.: New York Academy of Sciences.
A return to biological thinking in medicine.Henrik R. Wulff - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (1):1-3.
Biological Criteria of Disease: Four Ways of Going Wrong.John Matthewson & Paul Edmund Griffiths - 2017 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1 (4).
The Case for Basic Biological Research.Isobel Ronai & Paul Edmund Griffiths - 2019 - Trends in Molecular Medicine 25 (2).
Navigating conflicts of justice in the use of race and ethnicity in precision medicine.G. Owen Schaefer, E. Shyong Tai & Shirley Hsiao-Li Sun - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (8):849-856.
We Have “Gifted” Enough: Indigenous Genomic Data Sovereignty in Precision Medicine.Janis Geary, Jessica A. Kolopenuk, Joseph M. Yracheta & Krystal S. Tsosie - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (4):72-75.
On the uniqueness of biological research.Adolph Portmann - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (5):457-472.
Function, Dysfunction, and Normality in Biological Sciences.Etienne Roux - 2018 - Biological Theory 13 (1):17-28.
Hurd, J.P. (ed.): 1996, Investigating the Biological Foundations of Human Morality. [REVIEW]Andreas Vieth - 1998 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (2):192-193.
N = Many Me’s: Self-Surveillance for Precision Public Health.Hub Zwart & Mira Vegter - 2021 - Biosocieties 16.
Obligations of the “Gift”: Reciprocity and Responsibility in Precision Medicine.Sandra Soo-Jin Lee - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (4):57-66.
Precision Medicine Approaches and the Health of Populations: Study Design Concerns and Considerations.Sandro Galea & Salma M. Abdalla - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 61 (4):527-536.
Evolutionary Biology and the Concept of Disease.Anne Gammelgaard - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy: A European Journal 3 (2):109-116.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-05-23
Downloads
149 (#99,980)
6 months
39 (#54,536)
2022-05-23
Downloads
149 (#99,980)
6 months
39 (#54,536)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-75b4f85656-rfpl5 N