Using a bad tool with good intention: How preschoolers weigh physical and intentional cues when learning about artifacts

Cognition 97:327-335 (2005)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,955
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Intention-Based Semantics.Emma Borg - 2006 - In Ernest Lepore & Barry Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press. pp. 250--266.
Intentional Systems.Daniel C. Dennett - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (February):87-106.
Intentio and Praeter Intentionem in the Constitution of the Moral Object in Thomas Aquinas.Andrew Jaspers - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:149-159.
Causalism and Intentional Omission.Joshua Shepherd - 2014 - American Philosophical Quarterly 51 (1):15-26.
The Learning of Responses to Multiple Weighted Cues.Stanley A. Summers - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (1):29.
What Have I Done?Timothy Chappell - 2013 - Diametros 38:86-111.
The Nature of Artifacts.Steven Vogel - 2003 - Environmental Ethics 25 (2):149-168.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-20

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes