Consistency in the Armed Enforcement of Human Rights: A Moral Necessity?

Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (1):92-109 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is no denying that international human rights norms are enforced selectively. Some oppressive governments become the targets of military intervention, while the political sovereignty of other, equally oppressive regimes is left intact. My aim in this paper is to determine whether a military operation to defend human rights can possibly be made morally illegitimate by the fact that the state prosecuting it has failed, is failing or will fail to defend human rights under relevantly similar circumstances elsewhere

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-06

Downloads
64 (#252,064)

6 months
16 (#154,895)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ned Dobos
University of New South Wales

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Noncomparative justice.Joel Feinberg - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (3):297-338.
The Duty to Protect.Kok-Chor Tan - 2006 - In Terry Nardin & Melissa Williams (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention. New York University Press.
Toward a Realist Ethics of Intervention.Michael Wesley - 2005 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (2):55-72.

Add more references