Managing the Growth of Peer Review at the Royal Society Journals, 1865-1965

Science, Technology, and Human Values 45 (3):405-429 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines the evolution of peer review and the modern editorial processes of scholarly journals by analyzing a novel data set derived from the Royal Society’s archives and covering 1865-1965, that is, the historical period in which refereeing became firmly established. Our analysis reveals how the Royal Society’s editorial processes coped with both an increasing reliance on refereeing and a growth in submissions, while maintaining collective responsibility and minimizing research waste. By engaging more of its fellows in editorial activity, the society was able to establish an equilibrium of number of submissions per reviewer that was relatively stable over time. Nevertheless, our analysis shows that the distribution of editorial work was significantly uneven. Our findings reveal interesting parallels with current concerns about the scale and distribution of peer review work and suggest the strategic importance of the management of the editorial process to achieve a creative mix of community commitment and professional responsibility that is essential in contemporary journals.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,109

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On doffing the mask.D. G. Brown - 2007 - Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (2-4):217-219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-24

Downloads
24 (#768,807)

6 months
6 (#743,012)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?