Law and Philosophy 30 (2):167-199 (2011)

Authors
Luís Duarte D'Almeida
University of Edinburgh
Abstract
Can there be a non-reductivist, source-based explanation of the use of normative language in statements describing the law and legal situations? This problem was formulated by Joseph Raz, who also claimed to have solved it. According to his well-known doctrine of ‘detached’ statements, normative legal statements can be informatively made by speakers who merely adopt, without necessarily sharing, the point of view of someone who accepts that legal norms are justified and ought to be followed. In this paper I defend two theses. I argue, first, that the notion of a detached statement cannot be made to work, and that Raz’s problem is thus not thereby solved. But the problem itself, I also suggest, is a false one
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy of Law   Political Science   Law Theory/Law Philosophy   Logic   Social Sciences, general
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10982-010-9089-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,913
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Anarchist Official: A Problem for Legal Positivism.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2011 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36:89-112.
Natural Laws and the Problem of Provisos.Marc Lange - 1993 - Erkenntnis 38 (2):233Ð248.
The Linguistic Doctrine Revisited.Hans-Johann Glock - 2003 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):143-170.
Might There Be Legal Reasons?Richard Paul Hamilton - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (4):425-447.
Normative Conflicts in Legal Reasoning.Giovanni Sartor - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (2-3):209-235.
Law, Fact and Legal Language.Lech Morawski - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):461-473.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-18

Total views
128 ( #75,958 of 2,409,853 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #541,271 of 2,409,853 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes