Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Will

Review of Metaphysics 56 (4):835 - 862 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Medieval Thomists such as the Dominican master John of Paris, on the other hand, attempted to defend Aquinas against such charges. Adopting Thomas’s notion of the passivity of the will, John nonetheless denied that such a position necessarily interferes with moral responsibility. He justified this stance on the grounds that an agent’s freedom is only violated when it is necessitated contrary to its own nature. Because the will is naturally suited to follow practical deliberation, its necessitation by the intellect leaves its freedom intact.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Existence of God as Self-Evident.Mark D. Gossiaux - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):57-79.
Thomas Aquinas on Sexual Pleasure.John Giles Milhaven - 1977 - Journal of Religious Ethics 5 (2):157 - 181.
The Thought of Thomas Aquinas.Brian Davies - 1992 - New York: Clarendon Press.
Aquinas.Anthony Kenny - 1969 - Garden City, N.Y.,: Anchor Books.


Added to PP

36 (#432,773)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Eardley
University of Guelph

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references