Averroes, Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on how is man understands

Vivarium 45 (1):69-92 (2007)
Abstract
Giles of Rome, in his early treatise, De plurificatione possibilis intellectus, criticizes the arguments of Thomas Aquinas against the Averroist doctrine of the uniqueness of the possible intellect on the grounds that Aquinas does not fully appreciate the distinction between material and intentional forms and the differences in how these forms are generated. Nevertheless, like Aquinas, he argues that Averroes' doctrine still results in the apparently absurd consequence that homo non intelligit, i.e., the individual, particular man, this man, does not understand. Giles, however, attempts to respond to certain "radical" Averroists, who, in a bold and clever maneuver, affirm that homo non intelligit. While Giles does effectively argue that homo non intelligit is not the opinion of Averroes, he is unable to demonstrate the absurdity of homo non intelligit in a manner that would be convincing to the Averroists. This is because Giles, like Aquinas, maintains that the intellect is a power of the soul, and thus has a different conception of the relation between body and intellect than do the Averroists, who emphasize the separateness of the intellect.
Keywords AVERROES   AVERROISM   THOMAS AQUINAS   INTELLECT   GILES OF ROME
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/156853407X183180
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,781
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Thomas Aquinas on Hylomorphism and the in-Act Principle.Kendall A. Fisher - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (6):1053-1072.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Aquinas's Naturalized Epistemology.Richard C. Taylor & Max Herrera - 2005 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:85-102.
Aquinas.Anthony Kenny - 1969 - Garden City, N.Y., Anchor Books.
Thomas Aquinas on Sexual Pleasure.John Giles Milhaven - 1977 - Journal of Religious Ethics 5 (2):157 - 181.
Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Will.P. S. Eardley - 2003 - Review of Metaphysics 56 (4):835 - 862.
Aquinas and Themistius on Intellect.Lorelle Lamascus - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:255-273.
Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Existence of God as Self-Evident.Mark D. Gossiaux - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):57-79.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
102 ( #51,614 of 2,199,499 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #300,207 of 2,199,499 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature