- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What revisions does bootstrap testing need? A reply
Philosophy of Science 55 (2):260-264 (1988)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- repository.cmu.edu
(no proxy) - repository.cmu.edu [2] (no proxy)
- repository.cmu.edu [3] (no proxy)
- journals.uchicago.edu (no proxy)
- journals.uchicago.edu [2] (no proxy)
- jstor.org (no proxy)
- jstor.org [2] (no proxy)
- jstor.org [3] (no proxy)
- cambridge.org (no proxy)
- journals.uchicago.edu [3] (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Discussion: what revisions does bootstrap testing need? A reply.John Earman & John D. Norton - unknown
What Revisions Does Bootstrap Testing Need?Jan M. Żytkow - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):101 - 109.
Book Review:Foundations of Space-Time Theories (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 8) John S. Earman, Clark N. Glymour, John J. Stachel. [REVIEW]Philip L. Quinn - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (2):327-.
Explanation and testing exchanges with Clark Glymour.Deborah G. Mayo - 2009 - In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. Cambridge University Press. pp. 351.
Glymour on bootstrap confirmation of ptolemaic theory.Brad Abernethy - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (3):473-479.
Testing Scientific Theories, John Earman (Ed.): Explaining Confirmation Practice:Testing Scientific Theories John Earman.Alison Wylie - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):292-.
Review: Testing Scientific Theories, John Earman (Ed.): Explaining Confirmation Practice. [REVIEW]Alison Wylie - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):292 - 303.
EARMAN, J., GLYMOUR, C. & STACHEL, J. "Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science", Vol. VIII: "Foundations of Space-Time Theories". [REVIEW]Graham Nerlich - 1979 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57:186.
John Earman, ed., Testing Scientific Theories. [REVIEW]Richard Otte - 1985 - Philosophy in Review 5:161-163.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
120 (#154,059)
6 months
7 (#491,177)
2009-01-28
Downloads
120 (#154,059)
6 months
7 (#491,177)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Bootstrap Confirmation Made Quantitative.Igor Douven & Wouter Meijs - 2006 - Synthese 149 (1):97-132.
References found in this work
What Revisions Does Bootstrap Testing Need?Jan M. Żytkow - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):101 - 109.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-s5tms uwo