Why Space is Not a Substance (at Least Not to First Degree)

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 67 (4):225-244 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1468-0114.1986.tb00275.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Substance of Bundles.M. Glouberman - 1975 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 56 (1):38.
Substance and Person.Andrew J. Reck - 1960 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 41 (3):277.
Aristotle on the Unity of Substance.Frank A. Lewis - 1995 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3-4):222-265.
Are There Substances? Another Look at the Classical Substance Concept.Laurence Foss - 1974 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 55 (1):5.
Science and the Science of Substance in Aristotle's Metaphysics Z.Robert Bolton - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3-4):419-469.
On Kant on Space.Morris Lipson - 1992 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73 (1):73-99.
John Earman, World Enough and Space-time: Absolute vs. relational theories of space and time Reviewed by.Carl Hoefer - 1991 - Philosophy in Review 11 (3):178-181.
World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time. John Earman. [REVIEW]M. L. G. Redhead - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):718-722.
Robinson Jeffer's Space.William White - 1963 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):175.
Review of John Earman: World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute Versus Relational Theories of Space and Time. [REVIEW]Anna Maidens - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1):129-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
38 (#432,587)

6 months
8 (#415,703)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Earman
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

How to count structure.Thomas William Barrett - 2022 - Noûs 56 (2):295-322.
What Theoretical Equivalence Could Not Be.Trevor Teitel - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (12):4119-4149.
Equivalent and Inequivalent Formulations of Classical Mechanics.Thomas William Barrett - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (4):1167-1199.
Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’.James Owen Weatherall - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axw012.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references