Amos Edelheit
Maynooth University
Francesco Patrizi was a competent Greek scholar, a mathematician, and a Neoplatonic thinker, well known for his sharp critique of Aristotle and the Aristotelian tradition. In this article I shall present, in the first part, the importance of the concept of a three-dimensional space which is regarded as a body, as opposed to the Aristotelian two-dimensional space or interval, in Patrizi’s discussion of physical space. This point, I shall argue, is an essential part of Patrizi’s overall critique of Aristotelian science, in which Epicurean, Stoic, and mainly Neoplatonic elements were brought together, in what seems like an original theory of space and a radical revision of Aristotelian physics. Moreover, I shall try to show Patrizi’s dialectical method of definition, his geometrical argumentation, and trace some of the ideas and terms used by him back to Proclus’ Commentary on Euclid. This text of Proclus, as will be shown in the second part of the article, was also important for Patrizi’s discussion of mathematical space, where Patrizi deals with the status of mathematics and redefines some mathematical concepts such as the point and the line according to his new theory of space.Keywords: Francesco Patrizi; Space; Geometry; Mathematics; Aristotle; Proclus.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.07.002
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker.A. L. Hilliard - 1952 - Journal of Philosophy 49 (6):191-192.
Perennial Philosophy: From Agostino Steuco to Leibniz.Charles B. Schmitt - 1966 - Journal of the History of Ideas 27 (4):505-532.
Renaissance Philosophy.Lynn S. Joy - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173):537-539.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Philosophical Systems of Francesco Patrizi and Henry More.Jacques Joseph - 2019 - Intellectual History Review 29 (4):595-617.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Lettere Ed Opuscoli Inediti.Francesco Patrizi & Danilo Aguzzi Barbagli - 1975 - Istituto Nazionale di Studi Sul Rinascimento.
Locus Est Spatium : On Gerald Odonis' Quaestio de Loco.Paul J. J. M. Bakker & Sander W. de Boer - 2009 - In Lambertus Marie de Rijk, William Duba & Christopher David Schabel (eds.), Vivarium. Brill. pp. 295-330.
Fortunio Liceti on Mind, Light, and Immaterial Extension.Andreas Blank - 2013 - Perspectives on Science 21 (3):358-378.
Time, Topology and Physical Geometry.Tim Maudlin - 2010 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):63-78.


Added to PP index

Total views
44 ( #248,002 of 2,462,427 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,313 of 2,462,427 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes