Francesco Patrizi’s concept of “nature”: presence and refutation of Stoicism

Intellectual History Review 29 (4):575-593 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay analyzes the ways in which, in his Nova de Universis Philosophia, Francesco Patrizi uses, adopts, and, in some cases, rejects the Stoic philosophical tradition. Although, at first glance, most of Patrizi’s remarks on Stoicism and Stoic understanding of nature are critical – as this article demonstrates – he widely relied on Stoic teaching that he sought to combine with Neoplatonism and the prisca theologia doctrine.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-06

Downloads
18 (#860,222)

6 months
13 (#219,908)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Leinkauf
University of Münster

Citations of this work

Patrizi, panpsychism, and the Presocratics.Vojtěch Hladký - 2024 - Intellectual History Review 34 (1):5-32.
The soul and force in Patricius’s Nova de universis philosophia.Luka Boršić - 2024 - Intellectual History Review 34 (1):107-125.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Origins of Stoic Cosmology.David E. Hahm - 1978 - Philosophical Review 87 (4):620-623.
Physics of the Stoics.S. SAMBURSKY - 1959 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 14 (4):558-559.
Stoic metaphysics.Jacques Brunschwig - 2003 - In Brad Inwood (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 206--232.

View all 11 references / Add more references