Persons, Animals, and Machines

Science, Technology and Human Values 23 (4):384-398 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is the relationship between persons, animals, and machines? The author first presents a form of argument against any attempt to reduce biology to mechanism. He then runs a parallel argument for psychology and biology. But although he tries to resist reduction, he insists that to bring into being a person or an animal requires no more than the construction of a certain sort of machine, or causal engine, such that certain normative standards can be applied to its behavior If to call an entity a machine is to forego such commitments, then, trivially, no animal or person could be a machine. If the term "machine" implies no more than the presence of a causal engine, natural or artificial, then machines can be, and some are, animals or people.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
2 (#1,818,315)

6 months
1 (#1,516,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Egg Timers, Human Values, and the Care of Autistic Youths.Ruud Hendriks - 1998 - Science, Technology and Human Values 23 (4):399-424.
Function by Agreement.Pablo Schyfter - 2015 - Social Epistemology 29 (2):185-206.
Riddle Me This: The Craft and Concept of Animal Mind.Tony Ashford & Graham Cox - 1998 - Science, Technology and Human Values 23 (4):425-438.

Add more citations