Money, Monetary Crisis, and the Doctrine of Being

The Owl of Minerva 26 (2):149-169 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scholars who consider the relationship between Marx’s and Hegel’s scientific method often make a critical mistake. In the exposition of the manner in which Marx had made use of Hegel’s logic, they fail to consider the relationship between form and content in the logical progression of categories. They fail to comprehend the circular nature of scientific method, with its attending concepts of “dialectic” and Aufhebung.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Money, Monetary Crisis, and the Doctrine of Being.Mark E. Meaney - 1995 - The Owl of Minerva 26 (2):149-169.
Capital as Organic Unity. [REVIEW]J. Murray Murdoch - 2006 - The Owl of Minerva 37 (2):196-199.
Hegel’s Mediated Immediacies.Edward A. Beach - 2010 - The Owl of Minerva 42 (1-2):153-217.
The Dialectic of Becoming in Hegel’s Logic.George P. Cave - 1985 - The Owl of Minerva 16 (2):147-160.
Thinking on the Double.William Desmond - 1994 - The Owl of Minerva 25 (2):221-234.
The Difference Between Hegel's and Marx's Doctrines of Logic.Dennis James Fuller - 1986 - Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University
Marx’s Inferential Commitment to Hegel’s Idealism in the Grundrisse.Matthew J. Smetona - 2012 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):351-372.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
3 (#1,730,340)

6 months
2 (#1,445,278)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark E. Meaney
Marquette University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references