Authors
Nathan Emmerich
Australian National University
Bert Gordijn
Dublin City University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0963180118000348
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,209
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Why We Should Defend Gene Editing as Eugenics.Nicholas Agar - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (1):9-19.
Liberal Eugenics.Nicholas Agar - 1998 - Public Affairs Quarterly 12 (2):137-155.
"Eugenics Talk" and the Language of Bioethics.S. Wilkinson - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (6):467-471.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

When Harvard Said No to Eugenics: The J. Ewing Mears Bequest, 1927.Paul A. Lombardo - 2014 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 57 (3):374-392.
Liberalism and Eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):499 - 517.
Genetic Enhancement and the Biopolitical Horizon of Class Conflict.Wade Roberts - 2010 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 18 (1):27-42.
Etika lidského vylepšování a liberální eugenika.Tomas Hribek - 2014 - Filosoficky Casopis 62 (6):847-861.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-12-21

Total views
15 ( #678,772 of 2,455,352 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,153 of 2,455,352 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes