The Point of Scientificity, the Fall of the Epistemological Dominos, and the End of the Field of Educational Administration
Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (2):109-136 (2002)
The point of scientificity, or pos,represents a place in history whereeducational administration was founded as ascience. A pos creates a field of memoryand a field of studies. A pos isepistemologically sustained in its claim forscientific status by a line of demarcation orlod. A lod is supported by truthclaims based on various forms ofcorrespondence. As these forms have beeninterrogated and abandoned, correspondence hasgiven way to coherentism and finally to testsof falsification. As falsification has shownto contain serious flaws when compared to theactual history of scientific discoveries, theentire project of a distinct and unitaryfield known as educational administration isseriously cast into doubt. Contemporaryexaminations in educational administrationdiscourse show that even when the lod hasbeen undermined by epistemological shifts, theinitial pos has remained to supportclaims regarding the project of a ``science ofleadership.'' The analysis contained in thisarticle show, however, that when claims of thelod are demonstrably unsustainable, theinitial pos must be similarly abandoned. With that collapse the concept of a fieldis likewise effaced. The epistemologicalalternative is to envision fields ofstudy which do not require a lod, excepton a longitudinal basis to ascertain whether aresearch program shaped and sustained by it isprogressive or regressive. In short, there areno aprori meta-criteria to separate sciencefrom non-science in educationaladministration
|Keywords||educational administration epistemology field conceptions line of demarcation paradigm point of scientificity research program|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Advocating a Post-Structuralist Politics for Educational Leadership.Richard Niesche & Christina Gowlett - 2015 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (4):372-386.
Similar books and articles
Doing Educational Administration: A Theory of Administrative Practice.C. W. Evers - 2000 - Pergamon Press.
Hope and Possibility: Advancing an Argument for a Habermasian Perspective in Educational Administration.Frances K. Kochan - 2002 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (2):137-155.
On the Epistemological Basis of Large-Scale Population Studies and Their Educational Use.Paul Smeyers - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (s1):63-86.
Aesthetic Dimensions of Educational Administration & Leadership.Eugénie Angèle Samier & Richard J. Bates (eds.) - 2006 - Routledge.
Some Implications of Educational Philosophy for Educational Administration.James F. Rogers - 1958 - Educational Theory 8 (1):23-26.
Governing Chaos: Postmodern Science, Information Technology and Educational Administration.Bill Green & Chris Bigum - 1993 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 25 (2):79–103.
Quantum Field Theory, its Concepts Viewed From a Semiotic Perspective.Hans Günter Dosch, Volkhard F. Müller & Norman Sieroka - unknown
Educational Administration.T. R. Bone - 1982 - British Journal of Educational Studies 30 (1):32 - 42.
Empirical Indefeasibility and Nonfactuality.Mikael Janvid - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):183-197.
A New Synthesis of Public Administration: Serving in the 21st Century.Jocelyne Bourgon - 2011 - School of Policy Studies, Queen's University.
Embodied Experience in Educational Practice and Research.Jan Bengtsson - 2013 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 32 (1):39-53.
A Theoretical Consideration of Educational Administration.H. Gordon Hullfish - 1958 - Educational Theory 8 (2):65-75.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads18 ( #270,400 of 2,168,644 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #82,721 of 2,168,644 )
How can I increase my downloads?