From being ontologically serious to serious ontology

In John Heil: symposium on his ontological point of view. New Brunswick, NJ: Ontos. pp. 191--206 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper first argues that if one takes current fundamental physics seriously, one gets to a metaphysics of events and relations in contrast to substances and intrinsic properties. Against that background, the paper discusses Heil’s theory of properties being both categorical and dispositional and his rejection of levels of being. I contrast these views with a Humean metaphysics. My concluding claim is that Heil’s account of properties opens up the perspective of a conservative reductionism, which avoids the common reservations against reductionism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Do zombies Hunger for Humean brains?Neil E. Williams - 2007 - SWIF Philosophy of Mind Review 6 (2):62-72.
Relations. Basic Elements in Metaphysics. [REVIEW]Fraser Macbride - 2024 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 31 (5):734-738.
Conservative Reductionism.Michael Esfeld & Christian Sachse - 2011 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Christian Sachse.
Naturalness, Arbitrariness, and Serious Ontology.A. R. J. Fisher - 2022 - In Helen Beebee & A. R. J. Fisher (eds.), Perspectives on the Philosophy of David K. Lewis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 134-53.
Nature's metaphysics.Peter Menzies - 2009 - Analysis 69 (4):769-778.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
115 (#44,362)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Esfeld
University of Lausanne

Citations of this work

Logic in reality.Joseph E. Brenner - 2008 - Dordrecht: Springer.
Preface.Raphael van Riel & Albert Newen - 2011 - Philosophia Naturalis 48 (1):5-8.

Add more citations