Meme-making: Poaching, Reappropriation, or Bricolage?

Abstract

Memes are a prominent example of a kind of digital artifact. It is widely agreed that an integral component of meme-making is the way in which it makes use of other existing material. In this paper, I examine three different ways of understanding this making use of. First, it has been seen in economic terms, as a kind of poaching. Secondly, the cultural concept of (re)appropriation has been deployed. Finally, Lévi-Strauss’s notion of bricolage is often mentioned. I argue that despite some interesting insights deriving from the first two approaches, it is the third that gives the most comprehensive and interesting take on meme-making.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Philosophy Through Memes.Simon J. Evnine - 2022 - In Lee C. McIntyre, Nancy Arden McHugh & Ian Olasov (eds.), A companion to public philosophy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 311–324.
The Anonymity of a Murmur: Internet Memes.Simon J. Evnine - 2018 - British Journal of Aesthetics 58 (3):303-318.
Memes and the Ecological Niche.Deby L. Cassill & Benjamin E. Hardisty - 2010 - Biological Theory 5 (2):109-111.
Political memes in the 2018 presidential campaigns in Russia: Dialogue and conflict.Natalia Lukianova, Maria Shteynman & Elena Fell - 2019 - Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 10 (1):71-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-06-18

Downloads
73 (#220,224)

6 months
73 (#77,804)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Simon Evnine
University of Miami

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references