Darwin's artificial selection as an experiment

Darwin used artificial selection extensively and variedly in his theorizing. Darwin used ASN as an analogy to natural selection; he compared artificial to natural varieties, hereditary variation in nature to that in the breeding farm; and he also compared the overall effectiveness of the two processes. Most historians and philosophers of biology have argued that ASN worked as an analogical field in Darwin’s theorizing. I will argue rather that this provides a limited and somewhat muddled view of Darwinian science. I say “limited” because I will show that Darwin also used ASN as a complex experimental field. And I say “muddled” because, if we concentrate on the analogical role exclusively, we conceive Darwinian science as rather disconnected from contemporary conceptions of “good science”.I will argue that ASN should be conceived as a multifaceted experiment. As a traditional experiment, ASN established the efficacy of Darwin’s preferred cause: natural selection. As a non-traditional experiment, ASN disclosed the nature of a crucial element in Darwin’s evolutionary mechanics: the nature of hereditary variation. Finally, I will argue that the experiment conception should help us make sense of Darwin’s comments regarding the “monstrous” nature of domestic breeds_traditionally considered to be problematic
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.12.002
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,422
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
M. J. S. Hodge (1977). The Structure and Strategy of Darwin's ‘Long Argument’. British Journal for the History of Science 10 (3):237-246.
Michael Ruse (1975). Charles Darwin and Artificial Selection. Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (2):339.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
C. Kenneth Waters (1986). Taking Analogical Inference Seriously: Darwin's Argument From Artificial Selection. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:502 - 513.
Jerry Fodor (2008). Against Darwinism. Mind and Language 23 (1):1–24.
James G. Lennox (1993). Darwin Was a Teleologist. Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):409-421.
Roberta L. Millstein (2012). Darwin's Explanation of Races by Means of Sexual Selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (3):627-633.
A. R. (1997). Darwin and the Inefficacy of Artificial Selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (1):75-97.
Richard A. Richards (1997). Darwin and the Inefficacy of Artificial Selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (1):75-97.
Susan G. Sterrett (2002). Darwin's Analogy Between Artificial and Natural Selection: How Does It Go? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (1):151-168.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

17 ( #267,978 of 1,924,770 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

9 ( #96,510 of 1,924,770 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.