World Futures 52 (3):239-280 (1998)

Abstract
This paper critically examines Ken Wilber's transpersonal evolutionary theory in the context of the philosophical discourse of postmodernity. The critique focuses on Wilber's refutation of non?absolutist and non?universalist approaches to rationality, truth, and morality?such as cultural relativism, pluralism, constructivism or perspectivism?under the charges of being epistemologically self?refuting and morally pernicious. First, it is suggested that Wilber offers a faulty dichotomy between his absolutist?universalist metanarrative and a self?contradictory and pernicious vulgar relativism. Second, it is shown that Wilber's arguments for the self?refuting and pernicious nature of other non?absolutist approaches are both fallacious and distorting. Finally, the problematic consequences of absolutist discourse for academic and cross?cultural dialogue are pinpointed. Taking Wilber's treatment of Nagarjuna's thinking as a paradigmatic example, it is suggested that absolutist thinking both usually leads to ?bad? hermeneutics, and potentially hinders genuine dialogue among people and traditions holding different world views
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02604027.1998.9972709
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,319
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ways of Worldmaking.Nelson Goodman - 1978 - Harvester Press.
Truth and Method.H. G. Gadamer - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (4):487-490.
Whose Justice? Which Rationality?Alasdair MacIntyre - 1988 - University of Notre Dame Press.

View all 68 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Neither Absolutism nor Relativism.Meredith Garmon - 1995 - Metaphilosophy 26 (4):347-359.
Why Content Relativism Does Not Imply Fact Relativism.Achim Lohmar - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):145-162.
Absolutism Vs. Relativism in Contemporary Ontology.Robert F. Allen - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:343-352.
Transpersonal Heterophenomenology?William A. Adams - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (4):89-93.
Current Status of Transpersonal Psychology.Charles Tart - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (4):83-87.
Moral Relativism and Moral Expressivism.Berit Brogaard - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):538-556.
Defence of Cultural Relativism.Seungbae Park - 2011 - Cultura 8 (1):159-170.
A Critique of Harman’s Empiric Relativism.Byron L. Haines - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:97-107.
Relativism, Standards and Aesthetic Judgements.James O. Young - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):221 – 231.
Absolutism and Relativism in Ethics.Shia Moser - 1968 - Springfield, Ill., Thomas.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-01

Total views
43 ( #248,656 of 2,448,669 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #447,034 of 2,448,669 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes