The Analysis and Evaluation of Legal Argumentation: Approaches from Legal Theory and Argumentation Theory

&
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16 (29) (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Eveline T. Feteris, Fundamental of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of Justification of Judicial Decisions (1999). [REVIEW]William Twining - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (2):223-229.
Eveline T. Feteris, Fundamental of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of Justification of Judicial Decisions (1999). [REVIEW]William Twining - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (2):223-229.
Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of legal argumentation: Springer, 2017, 2nd edn, pp. 363.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (3):307-314.
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
The Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Teleological Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):489-506.
A dialogical theory of legal discussions:Pragma-dialectical analysis and evaluation of legalargumentation.Eveline T. Feteris - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):115-135.
The Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Teleological-Evaluative Argumentation in Complex Structures of Legal Justification.Eveline Feteris - unknown
Argumentation Theory and the Conception of Epistemic Justification.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2009 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16 (29).
The Rational Reconstruction of Argumentation Referring to Consequences and Purposes in the Application of Legal Rules: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Eveline T. Feteris - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):459-470.
Witness Impeachment in Cross-Examination Using Ad Hominem Argumentation.Douglas Walton - 2018 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 55 (1):93-114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-10

Downloads
9 (#1,267,182)

6 months
9 (#437,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eveline Feteris
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The concept of law.Hla Hart - 1961 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Concept of Law.Stuart M. Brown - 1963 - Philosophical Review 72 (2):250.
On Law and Reason.Aleksander Peczenik - 1989 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag.

View all 36 references / Add more references