The rational reconstruction of argumentation referring to consequences and purposes in the application of legal rules: A pragma-dialectical perspective

Argumentation 19 (4):459-470 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper, the author develops an instrument for the rational reconstruction of argumentation in which a judicial decision is justified by referring to the consequences in relation to the purpose of the rule. The instrument is developed by integrating insights from legal theory and legal philosophy about the function and use of arguments from consequences in relation to the purpose of a rule into a pragma-dialectical framework. Then, by applying the instrument to the analysis of examples from legal practice, it is demonstrated that the instrument can offer a heuristic and critical tool for the analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation that can ‘bridge’ the gap between more abstract discussions of forms of legal argumentation on the one hand, and legal arguments as they occur in actual legal practice on the other hand



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,310

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analogy Argumentation in Law: A Dialectical Perspective. [REVIEW]Harm Kloosterhuis - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):173-187.


Added to PP

45 (#257,224)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eveline Feteris
University of Amsterdam

References found in this work

Law’s Empire.Ronald Dworkin - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
The Nature of Rationality.Robert Nozick - 1993 - Princeton University Press.
On Law and Reason.Aleksander Peczenik - 1989 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag.
The Nature of Rationality.Robert Nozick - 1993 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 186 (1):187-189.

View all 14 references / Add more references