- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument
Informal Logic 23 (1) (2003)
Abstract
A critical examination of the dialectical approach, focusing on a comparison ofthe illative and the dialectical definitions of argument. I distinguish a moderate, a strong and a hyper dialectical conception of argument. I critique Goldman's argument for the moderate conception and Johnson's argument for the strong conception, and argue that the moderate conception is correct.Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- amr.uwindsor.ca
(no proxy) - amr.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- celt.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- celt.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- hrgpapers.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- hrgpapers.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- ojs.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- ojs.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- ojs.uwindsor.ca [3] (no proxy)
- phaenex.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- phaenex.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- scholar.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- scholar.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- informallogic.ca (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Why the Dialectical Tier is an Epistemic Animal.Scott Aikin - 2018 - In Steve Oswald (ed.), Argumentation and Inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017. College Publications. pp. 11-22.
A Concept Divided: Ralph Johnson's Definition of Argument. [REVIEW]Christopher W. Tindale - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):299-309.
A Reaction to Critique from the Epistemological Sidelines.Bart Garssen - 2024 - Informal Logic 44 (1):527-542.
A Reaction to Critique from the Epistemological Sidelines.Bart Garssen - 2024 - Informal Logic 44 (1):527-542.
A Reaction to Critique from the Epistemological Sidelines.Bart Garssen - 2024 - Informal Logic 44 (1):527-542.
How Critical is the Dialectical Tier?: Exploring the Critical Dimension in the Dialectical Tier.Qingyin Liang & Yun Xie - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):229-242.
Manifest Rationality Reconsidered: Reply to my Fellow Symposiasts. [REVIEW]Ralph H. Johnson - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):311-331.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-24
Downloads
39 (#421,361)
6 months
3 (#1,045,901)
2013-11-24
Downloads
39 (#421,361)
6 months
3 (#1,045,901)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
On the Norms of Visual Argument: A Case for Normative Non-revisionism.David Godden - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (2):395-431.
Reasoning and Arguing, Dialectically and Dialogically, Among Individual and Multiple Participants.Michael D. Baumtrog - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (1):77-98.
References found in this work
Logical foundations of probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning.Douglas Neil Walton & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1995 - Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-w2v2s uwo