Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument

Informal Logic 23 (1) (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A critical examination of the dialectical approach, focusing on a comparison ofthe illative and the dialectical definitions of argument. I distinguish a moderate, a strong and a hyper dialectical conception of argument. I critique Goldman's argument for the moderate conception and Johnson's argument for the strong conception, and argue that the moderate conception is correct.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Argument Has No Function.Jean Goodwin - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):69-90.
The Principle of Vulnerability.Ralph H. Johnson - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (2).


Added to PP

36 (#366,648)

6 months
2 (#517,597)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?