Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)
In the May 15, 1935 issue of Physical Review Albert Einstein co-authored a paper with his two postdoctoral research associates at the Institute for Advanced Study, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen. The article was entitled “Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?” (Einstein et al. 1935). Generally referred to as “EPR”, this paper quickly became a centerpiece in the debate over the interpretation of the quantum theory, a debate that continues today. The paper features a striking case where two quantum systems interact in such a way as to link both their spatial coordinates in a certain direction and also their linear momenta (in the same direction). As a result of this “entanglement”, determining either position or momentum for one system would fix (respectively) the position or the momentum of the other. EPR use this case to argue that one cannot maintain both an intuitive condition of local action and the completeness of the quantum description by means of the wave function. This entry describes the argument of that 1935 paper, considers several different versions and reactions, and explores the ongoing significance of the issues they raise
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
How Can Computer Simulations Produce New Knowledge?Claus Beisbart - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3):395-434.
When Champions Meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein Debate.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (1):212-242.
Bohr as a Phenomenological Realist.Towfic Shomar - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):321-349.
When Champions Meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein Debate.N. P. Landsman - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (1):212-242.
Similar books and articles
On the Formal Connection of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument to Quantum Mechanics and Reality.Daniel Schoch - 1988 - Erkenntnis 29 (2):269 - 278.
An Einstein Manuscript on the EPR Paradox for Spin Observables.Tilman Sauer - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (4):879-887.
Relativity, Quantum Mechanics and EPR.Robert Clifton, Constantine Pagonis & Itamar Pitowsky - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:114 - 128.
Separable Hidden Variables Theory to Explain Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.S. V. Bhave - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):467-475.
Quantum Logic, Conditional Probability, and Interference.Jeffrey Bub - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):402-421.
The Einstein--Podolsky--Rosen Argument and the Bell Inequalities.László E. Szabó - 2008 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Sharp and the Refutation of the Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen Paradox.C. A. Hooker - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (2):224-233.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads64 ( #79,701 of 2,153,474 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #105,171 of 2,153,474 )
How can I increase my downloads?