The Port-Royal Logic's Theory of Argument

Argumentation 11 (4):393-410 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a critical examination of Antoine Arnauld's Logic or the Art of Thinking (1662), commonly known as the Port-Royal Logic. Rather than reading this work from the viewpoint of post-Fregean formal logic or the viewpoint of seventeenth-century intellectual history, I approach it with the aim of exploring its relationship to that contemporary field which may be labeled informal logic and/or argumentation theory. It turns out that the Port-Royal Logic is a precursor of this current field, or conversely, that this field may be said to be in the same tradition

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Port Royal Logic.John N. Martin - 2017 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Truth and Meaning in the Port-Royal Logic.Pierre Baumann - 2014 - Fenomenologia. Diálogos Possíveis Campinas: Alínea/Goiânia: Editora da Puc Goiás 96:127-140.
A Note on ‘Distributive Terms, Truth, and The Port Royal Logic’.John Neil Martin - 2016 - History and Philosophy of Logic 37 (4):391-392.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-11

Downloads
92 (#182,420)

6 months
15 (#234,431)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How Berkeley's Gardener Knows his Cherry Tree.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):553-576.
Old and New Fallacies in Port-Royal Logic.Michel Dufour - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (2):241-267.

Add more citations