American Journal of Bioethics 22 (4):19-30 (2021)

To design effective strategies to improve ethics consultation practices, it is important to understand the views of ethics practitioners. Previous U.S. studies of ethics practitioners have ove...
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2022
DOI 10.1080/15265161.2021.1893550
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Debating Ethical Expertise.Norbert L. Steinkamp, Bert Gordijn & Henk A. . M. . J. Ten Have - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (2):173-192.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Good, the Bad, and the Inconvenient.Giles Scofield - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (4):73-75.
Ethics Consultation: Data and the Path to Professionalization.Felicia Cohn - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (4):1-4.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Quality Is Addressed So Rarely in Clinical Ethics Consultation.George J. Agich - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (4):339.
The Question of Method in Ethics Consultation.George J. Agich - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (4):31 – 41.


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #1,071,638 of 2,518,732 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,732 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes