Classical theism, panentheism, and pantheism: On the relation between God construction and gender construction

Zygon 28 (1):29-46 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The argument of this article is that, philosophically, there are but three broad conceptual models that Western thought employs in thinking about the meaning of God. At the level of greatest generality, these are the models known as classical theism, pantheism, and panentheism. The essay surveys and updates these three conceptual models in light of recent writings, finds more flaws in classical theism and panentheism than in pantheism, and suggests a feminist response to each.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
117 (#157,035)

6 months
12 (#242,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nancy Frankenberry
Dartmouth College

References found in this work

Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
The varieties of religious experience. A Study in human Nature.William James - 1902 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 54:516-527.
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos, Alan Musgrave, Roger C. Buck & Robert S. Cohen - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):266-274.
A Pluralistic Universe.William James - 1909 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
A Pluralistic Universe.William James - 1909 - Mind 18 (72):576-588.

View all 18 references / Add more references