Why do Scientists Prefer to Vary their Experiments?

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (1):51 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/0039-3681(84)90029-3

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

"When" do Scientists Prefer to Vary their Experiments?H. M. Collins - 1984 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (2):169.
Review: Allan Franklin. Shifting Standards: Experiments in Particle Physics in the Twentieth Century. [REVIEW]Vitaly Pronskikh - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (4):727-730.
Review: Allan Franklin. Shifting Standards: Experiments in Particle Physics in the Twentieth Century. [REVIEW]Review by: Vitaly Pronskikh - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (4):727-730.
Allan Franklin. Shifting Standards: Experiments in Particle Physics in the Twentieth Century. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2013. Pp. 360. $50.00. [REVIEW]Kent Staley & Heraclio Tavares - 2016 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (1):158-162.
The qualities of good experiments: Allan Franklin: What makes a good experiment? Reasons and roles in science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2016, 372+viiipp, $55 HB. [REVIEW]Adam Morton - 2016 - Metascience 25 (3):443-446.
Experiment, Right or Wrong.Allan Franklin - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Allan Franklin, Shifting Standards: Experiments in Particle Physics in the Twentieth Century. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press , 302 pp., $45.98. [REVIEW]Vitaly Pronskikh - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (4):727-730.
Franklin’s Field Guide to Scientific Experiments - Allan Franklin, What Makes a Good Experiment? Reasons and Roles in Science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press (2016), 384 pp., $55.00. [REVIEW]Nora Mills Boyd - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (3):586-594.
Allan Franklin, Right or Wrong.Robert Ackermann - 1990 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990 (2):450-457.
Allan Franklin, Right or Wrong.Robert Ackermann - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:451-457.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
23 (#671,645)

6 months
11 (#339,306)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Philosophy of Psychiatry.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2021 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robustness, discordance, and relevance.Jacob Stegenga - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):650-661.
Robustness and reality.Markus I. Eronen - 2015 - Synthese 192 (12):3961-3977.

View all 48 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Probability and Evidence.Paul Horwich - 1982 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 47 (4):687-688.
Bayesian Personalism, the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, and Duhem's Problem.Jon Dorling - 1979 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 10 (3):177.
A Bayesian Reconstruction of the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.M. L. G. Redhead - 1980 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 11 (4):341.
On the utility of repeating the 'same' experiment.Peter Urbach - 1981 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (2):151 – 162.
The Discovery and Nondiscovery of Parity Nonconservation.Allan Franklin - 1979 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 10 (3):201.

Add more references