Metaphysics and Magic: Echoes of the Tractatus in Wittgenstein’s ‘Remarks on Frazer’

In Martin Stokhof & Hao Tang (eds.), Wittgenstein's Tractatus at 100. Springer Verlag. pp. 101-118 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter I trace a number of thematic connections between Wittgenstein’s Tractatus and Notebooks on the one hand, and his ‘Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough’ on the other. Pointing to this continuity will, I hope, bring out how the dimension of significance, central to the ‘Remarks on Frazer’, plays a role in the progress of the Tractatus, as well as elucidate how metaphysics is an expression and a distortion of the spiritual, similar to the one we find in magic and mythology. It would explain, as Wittgenstein puts it, “metaphysics as a kind of magic”.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein, Frazer, and religion.Brian R. Clack - 1999 - New York, N.Y.: St. Martin's Press.
Wittgenstein's Critique of Frazer.Jacques Bouveresse - 2008 - In John Preston (ed.), Wittgenstein and Reason. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 1–20.
Wittgenstein's Texts and Style.David G. Stern - 2017 - In Hans-Johann Glock & John Hyman (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 41–55.
Wittgenstein on Vaihinger and Frazer.Carlos Alves Pereira - 2015 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4 (1):145-165.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-24

Downloads
8 (#1,335,493)

6 months
5 (#838,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eli Friedlander
Tel Aviv University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references