Postlibertarianism is not libertarianism: Rejoinder to Nove

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (4):605-609 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/08913819208443283

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-18

Downloads
27 (#609,703)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrey Friedman
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

Libertarianisms: Mainstream, radical, and post.W. William Woolsey - 1994 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 8 (1):73-84.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The new consensus: I. The Fukuyama thesis.Jeffrey Friedman - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (3-4):373-410.
Libertarianism, postlibertarianism, and the welfare state: Reply to Friedman.Jan Narveson - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (1):45-82.
Minimal statism and metamodernism: Reply to Friedman.Donald N. McCloskey - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (1):107-112.
Dissent from “the new consensus”: Reply to Friedman.Antony Flew - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (1):83-96.
The right to private property: Reply to Friedman.Tibor R. Machan - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (1):97-106.

View all 7 references / Add more references