Authors |
|
Abstract |
The impossibility theorem of Dekel, Lipman and Rustichini has been thought to demonstrate
that standard state-space models cannot be used to represent unawareness. We first show that Dekel,
Lipman and Rustichini do not establish this claim. We then distinguish three notions of awareness,
and argue that although one of them may not be adequately modeled using standard state spaces,
there is no reason to think that standard state spaces cannot provide models of the other two notions.
In fact, standard space models of these forms of awareness are attractively simple. They allow us
to prove completeness and decidability results with ease, to carry over standard techniques from
decision theory, and to add propositional quantifiers straightforwardly.
|
Keywords | awareness attention conceivability agreeing to disagree no trade epistemic logic game theory |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Reasoning About Knowledge.Ronald Fagin, Joseph Y. Halpern, Yoram Moses & Moshe Vardi - 1995 - MIT Press.
Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions.Jaakko Hintikka - 1962 - Studia Logica 16:119-122.
View all 27 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Revisionist Reporting.Kyle Blumberg & Harvey Lederman - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (3):755-783.
Minimal Rationality and the Web of Questions.Daniel Hoek - forthcoming - In Dirk Kindermann, Peter van Elswyk & Andy Egan (eds.), Unstructured Content. Oxford University Press.
Similar books and articles
Two Models of Unawareness: Comparing the Object-Based and the Subjective-State-Space Approaches.Oliver J. Board, Kim-Sau Chung & Burkhard C. Schipper - 2011 - Synthese 179 (1):13 - 34.
Non Standard Regular Finite Set Theory.Stefano Baratella & Ruggero Ferro - 1995 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 41 (2):161-172.
Justifications, Awareness and Epistemic Dynamics.Igor Sedlár - 2013 - In Sergei Artemov & Anil Nerode (eds.), Logical Foundations of Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7734). Springer. pp. 307-318.
Extending Standard Models of ZFC to Models of Nonstandard Set Theories.Vladimir Kanovei & Michael Reeken - 2000 - Studia Logica 64 (1):37-59.
Theories of Truth Without Standard Models and Yablo’s Sequences.Eduardo Alejandro Barrio - 2010 - Studia Logica 96 (3):375-391.
Theories of Arithmetics in Finite Models.Michał Krynicki & Konrad Zdanowski - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (1):1-28.
Formal Models of Awareness.Thomas Ågotnes & Natasha Alechina - 2014 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (2):105-106.
Syntactic Foundations for Unawareness of Theorems.Spyros Galanis - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (4):593-614.
Modelling Def+Easible Reasoning by Means of Adaptive Logic Games.Peter Verdée - 2012 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 20 (2):417-437.
Standard Quantification Theory in the Analysis of English.Stephen Donaho - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (6):499-526.
The Evolution of Cooperation in the Centipede Game with Finite Populations.Rory Smead - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (2):157-177.
A Logic for Reasoning About Knowledge of Unawareness.Thomas Ågotnes & Natasha Alechina - 2014 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (2):197-217.
Epistemic Logic Meets Epistemic Game Theory: A Comparison Between Multi-Agent Kripke Models and Type Spaces.Paolo Galeazzi & Emiliano Lorini - 2016 - Synthese 193 (7):2097-2127.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-01-03
Total views
43 ( #234,217 of 2,410,110 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,206 of 2,410,110 )
2019-01-03
Total views
43 ( #234,217 of 2,410,110 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,206 of 2,410,110 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads