Understanding self-deception demands a co-evolutionary framework

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):23-24 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The foundational theme of the target article is that processes of self-deception occur in a functional context: a social one through which self-deceptive processes enhance fitness by affecting an actor's performances. One essential component of this context not addressed explicitly is that audiences should have been selected to resist, where possible, enhancements falsely bolstered by self-deception. Theoretical implications follow

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reviewing the logic of self-deception.Ellen Fridland - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):22-23.
Is real self-deception really all that biased?James Friedrich - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):113-114.
Varieties of self-deception.Robert F. Bornstein - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):108-109.
Self-deceived about self-deception: An evolutionary analysis.Mario Heilmann - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):116-117.
Thinking and believing in self-deception.Kent Bach - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):105-105.
Reflections on self-deception.William von Hippel & Robert Trivers - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):41-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
33 (#473,474)

6 months
5 (#837,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references