Simulation and interpersonal utility

Ethics 105 (4):709-726 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this article is to show how research in cognitive science is relevant to a certain theoretical issue in moral theory, namely, the legitimacy of interpersonal utility (IU) comparisons.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Alvin I. Goldman.William Child - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 45--21.
Simulation and interpersonal utility.A. Goldman - 1996 - In L. May, Michael Friedman & A. Clark (eds.), Ethics. MIT Press. pp. 709-726.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
51 (#310,745)

6 months
7 (#420,337)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alvin Goldman
Rutgers University - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

Autism, empathy and moral agency.Jeanette Kennett - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (208):340-357.
Interpersonal comparisons with preferences and desires.Jacob Barrett - 2019 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 18 (3):219-241.
IV—Empathy and First-Personal Imagining.Rae Langton - 2019 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119 (1):77-104.
Skepticism, Empathy, and Animal Suffering.Elisa Aaltola - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (4):457-467.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references