Monitoring ‘monitoring’ and evaluating ‘evaluation’: an ethical framework for monitoring and evaluation in public health: Table 1
Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (1):31-35 (2013)
Abstract
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is an essential part of public health programmes. Since M&E is the backbone of public health programmes, ethical considerations are important in their conduct. Some of the key ethical considerations are avoiding conflicts of interest, maintaining independence of judgement, maintaining fairness, transparency, full disclosure, privacy and confidentiality, respect, responsibility, accountability, empowerment and sustainability. There are several ethical frameworks in public health, but none focusing on the monitoring and evaluation process. There is a need to institutionalise the ethical review of M&E proposals. A theoretical framework for ethical considerations is proposed in this paper. This proposed theoretical framework can act as the blueprint for building the capacity of ethics committees to review M&E proposals. A case study is discussed in this context. After thorough field testing, this practical and field-based ethical framework can be widely used by donor agencies, M&E teams, institutional review boards and ethics committeesDOI
10.1136/medethics-2012-100680
My notes
Similar books and articles
The effects of computerized performance monitoring: An ethical perspective. [REVIEW]Stephen R. Hawk - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12):949 - 957.
Ethical issues in electronic performance monitoring: A consideration of deontological and teleological perspectives. [REVIEW]G. Stoney Alder - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (7):729-743.
Monitoring Clinical Research: An Obligation Unfulfilled.Charles Weijer, Stanley Shapiro, Abraham Fuks, Kathleen Cranley Glass & Myriam Skrutkowska - unknown
Animals show monitoring, but does monitoring imply awareness?Giuliana Mazzoni - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):349-350.
The same-order monitoring theory of consciousness.Uriah Kriegel - 2006 - In Uriah Kriegel & Kenneth Williford (eds.), Self-Representational Approaches to Consciousness. MIT Press. pp. 143--170.
Privacy, the workplace and the internet.Seumas Miller & John Weckert - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):255 - 265.
Attention, self, and conscious self-monitoring.Bernard J. Baars - 1998 - In A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Ethical, legal and economic aspects of employer monitoring of employee electronic mail.Thomas J. Hodson, Fred Englander & Valerie Englander - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 19 (1):99 - 108.
Individual differences in self-conscious source monitoring: Theoretical, experimental, and clinical considerations.Robert G. Kunzendorf - 2000 - In Robert G. Kunzendorf & B. Alan Wallace (eds.), Individual Differences in Conscious Experience. John Benjamins.
Applications of corporate social monitoring systems; types, dimensions, and goals.Karen Paul & Steven D. Lydenberg - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (1):1 - 10.
An Ethical Evaluation of Evidence: A Stewardship Approach to Public Health Policy.M. Walton & E. Mengwasser - 2012 - Public Health Ethics 5 (1):16-21.
Corporate social monitoring in south Africa: A decade of achievement, an uncertain future. [REVIEW]Karen Paul - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (6):463 - 469.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-10-31
Downloads
35 (#335,810)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
2012-10-31
Downloads
35 (#335,810)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
Historical graph of downloads