Authors
Jonathan L. Gorman
Queen's University, Belfast
Abstract
Examples of historical writing are analysed in detail, and it is demonstrated that, with respect to the statements which appear in historical accounts, their truth and value-freedom are neither necessary nor sufficient for the relative acceptability of historical accounts. What is both necessary and sufficient is the acceptability of the selection of statements involved, and it is shown that history can be objective only if the acceptability of selection can be made on the basis of a rational criterion of relevance. 'Relevance' and 'significance 1 are distinguished. The conditions of rationality of a criterion of acceptability are examined with special reference to Popper's criterion of 'falsifiability', which is shown to fail to apply to historical writing. General conclusions are drawn about the implications of the argument for the possibility of the 'unity of science', and about the conditions which need to be met if history is to be objective.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201747408601723
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,909
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Open Society and its Enemies.Karl R. Popper - 1945 - London: Princeton University Press.
What is History?Edward Hallett Carr - 1961 - New York: Knopf.
Can History Be Objective?Christopher Blake - 1955 - Mind 64 (253):61-78.
IV.—The Philosophy of History.H. B. Acton - 1940 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 40 (1):75-88.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Paul A. Roth and the Revival of Analytical Philosophy of History.Jonathan Gorman - 2018 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 14 (1):104-117.
The Need for Quinean Pragmatism in the Theory of History.Jonathan Gorman - 2016 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 8 (2).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Objectivity.Lorraine Daston - 2007 - The MIT Press.
Historical Objectivity and Value Neutrality.James Leach - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):349 – 367.
Narrative and History.Alun Munslow - 2007 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Putnam on the Fact-Value Dichotomy.Lars Bergström - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):117-129.
Could a Brain in a Vat Self‐Refer?Rory Madden - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):74-93.
Can Scientific History Repeat?Peter Barker - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:20 - 28.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-03-05

Total views
50 ( #197,992 of 2,402,075 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,323 of 2,402,075 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes