Further Problems with Neoclassical Environmental Economics

Environmental Ethics 16 (2):161-171 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We examine the merits of neoclassical environmental economics and discuss alternative approaches to it. We argue that the basic assumptions of the neoclassical approach, embodied in the indifference curve, make that model inappropriate for environmental analysis. We begin by assuming that the basic postulates of the neoclassical model hold and then argue that even this ideal state is incompatible with environmental sustainability. We discuss the role of the discount rate, the exclusive emphasis on marginal choices, and the assumption of perfect information.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,410

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Models of man: Neoclassical, behavioural, and evolutionary.Dennis C. Mueller - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):59-76.
Corporate environmental responsibility.Joe DesJardins - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (8):825 - 838.
Situational analysis beyond neoclassical economists.Lawrence A. Boland - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (4):515-521.
Four Dogmas of Environmental Economics.Mark Sagoff - 1994 - Environmental Values 3 (4):285 - 310.
Succeeding But Not Subversion: From Classical to Neoclassical and to Behavioral Economics.Jing-Tong He & Yi Na - 2007 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2:122-130.
The economics of ignorance or ignorance of economics?Paul Davidson - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (3-4):467-487.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
12 (#1,092,021)

6 months
2 (#1,206,727)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references