One phonemic representation should suffice

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):331-331 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Merge model suggests that lexical effects in phonemic processing reflect the activation of post-lexical phonemic representations that are distinct from prelexical phonemic input representations. This distinction seems to be unmotivated; the phoneme fails to capture the richness of prelexical representation. Increasing the information content of input representations minimizes the potential necessity for top-down processes. Footnotes1 The author is also affiliated with the Department of Psychology, Salem State College.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Phonemic organization does not occur: Hence no feedback.Richard M. Warren - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):350-351.
Motivation and phonemic priming effects on parafoveal information-processing.Ed Ferguson - 1990 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (6):487-487.
The trouble with merge: Modeling speeded target detection.Jonathan Grainger - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):331-332.
Phonemic recoding of digital information.Stefan Slak - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (3):398.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
8 (#517,646)

6 months
4 (#1,635,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references