Should We Retire Derek Parfit?

Hastings Center Report 41 (1):3-3 (2011)

Abstract
For nearly a generation, Derek Parfit's arguments in his 1984 book Reasons and Persons have shaped debates about our moral responsibilities to future people. Struggling to accommodate Parfit's insights, philosophers and bioethicists have minimized or accentuated obligations to the future in ways that defy ordinary moral intuitions. In this issue, Robert Sparrow develops the troubling implications of the views of two leading theorists whose work favoring human genetic enhancement is influenced by Parfit. Sparrow believes they return us to the horrors of early twentieth-century eugenics. But the real problem may be a purely theoretical one: the unfortunate influence of Parfit.This is no place to review all of ..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00083.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,736
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Impersonalism in Bioethics.Robert Ranisch - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):40 - 41.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-22

Total views
111 ( #66,614 of 2,243,790 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #624,610 of 2,243,790 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature