Fichte: Kantian or Spinozian? Three Interpretations of the Absolute I

South African Journal of Philosophy 29 (1):1-16 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Fichte is the first great Post-Kantian Idealist and his debt to Spinozism has been acknowledged by virtually all of his commentators. However, the extent of Spinoza’s influence on Fichte has not been spelled out in much detail. In response to this I propose to do two things. Firstly, I propose to provide a typology of interpretations of Fichte’s Absolute I, as some commentators seem to get entangled in these different interpretations, which can be very confusing to their readership. Secondly, I wish to demonstrate that the Fichtean system is better understood in the light of its Spinozist influences.

Similar books and articles

Fichte on Sex, Marriage, and Gender.Rory Lawrence Phillips - 2023 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31 (6):1168-1187.
Fichte und die analogia entis.Faustino Fabbianelli - 2019 - Fichte-Studien 47:129-146.
Agency and Evil in Fichte’s Ethics.Owen Ware - 2015 - Philosophers' Imprint 15.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-27

Downloads
1,186 (#11,128)

6 months
234 (#13,068)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex Guilherme
Liverpool Hope University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations