How to blow the whistle and still have a career afterwards

Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):51-64 (1998)

Abstract

Filing charges of scientific misconduct can be a risky and dangerous endeavor. This article presents rules of conduct to follow when considering whether to report perceived misconduct, and a set of step-by-step procedures for responsible whistleblowing that describe how to do so once the decision to report misconduct has been made. This advice is framed within the university setting, and may not apply fully in industrial settings.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,766

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
105 (#114,513)

6 months
2 (#258,199)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references