Philosophia 36 (4):483-493 (2008)

Adrian Haddock
University of Stirling
Arthur C. Danto’s Analytical Philosophy of History has a Kantian ambition: to state the conditions that make historical knowledge possible and to show “the unhappy destiny” that attends attempts to extend modes of representation beyond these conditions. Even though Danto’s book fails to achieve this ambition, it succeeds in making a number of important—if neglected—suggestions in the course of its attempt. One concerns the significance of the progressive tense for our thinking about human agency. Another concerns the way agency can impact negatively on the possibility of foreknowledge.
Keywords Arthur C. Danto  Philosophy of history  Critical philosophy  Transcendental Dialectic  Historical knowledge  Narrative sentences  Ideal Chronicle  Action  Progressive tense  Historical foreknowledge
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-008-9157-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,063
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
74 ( #138,501 of 2,427,709 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #181,048 of 2,427,709 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes