On the Irrelevance of Neuroscience to Moral Theory

The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 9 (2):173-179 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Irrelevance of Neuroscience to Moral Theory.Alon Harel - 2015 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 9 (2):173-179.
Still in Hot Water.Duncan Purves - 2011 - Southwest Philosophy Review 27 (1):129-137.
Natural Selection and Moral Sentiment.Charles W. Wright - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:459-467.
Neurolaw: Neuroscience, Ethics, and Law. Review Essay.Gerben Meynen - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):819-829.
Deep Ecology and the Irrelevance of Morality.Mathew Humphrey - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (1):75-79.
A Note on Irrelevance in Inductive Logic.Jeff B. Paris & Alena Vencovská - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (3):357 - 370.
The Price of Frankfurt’s Compatibalism.Bindu Madhok - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:577-584.
Moral Theory: An Introduction.Mark Timmons - 2001 - Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Neuroethics.Katrina Sifferd - 2016 - In Vilayanur Ramachandran (ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 2e. Elsevier.
The moral irrelevance of autonomy.Gary Comstock - 1992 - Between the Species 8 (1):4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
10 (#1,193,699)

6 months
3 (#976,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references