Generalization: A Practice of Situated Categorization in Talk [Book Review]

Human Studies 34 (2):183-198 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper analyzes four instances in talk of generalization about people, that is, of using statements about one or more people as the basis of stating something about a category. Generalization can be seen as a categorization practice which involves a reflexive relationship between the generalized-from person or people and the generalized-to category. One thing that is accomplished through generalization is instruction in how to understand the identity of the generalized-from person or people, so in addition to being understood as a practice of categorization, generalization can also be understood as a practice of identification. Somewhat incidentally, this paper also illustrates the importance of certain methodological issues related to membership categorization analysis and contributes to the growing body of work that connects membership categorization analysis with sequential conversation analysis.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,213

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

‘Everyone’, Consequences, and Generalization Arguments.J. Howard Sobel - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):373-404.
Concepts and Conceptual Analysis.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2):253-282.
Categorization and the Moral Order.Lena Jayyusi - 1984 - Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Geach on Generalization.Charles Sayward - 2002 - Dialogue 41 (2):221-.


Added to PP

30 (#385,836)

6 months
1 (#415,205)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?