Three varieties of mathematical structuralism

Philosophia Mathematica 9 (2):184-211 (2001)
Abstract
Three principal varieties of mathematical structuralism are compared: set-theoretic structuralism (‘STS’) using model theory, Shapiro's ante rem structuralism invoking sui generis universals (‘SGS’), and the author's modal-structuralism (‘MS’) invoking logical possibility. Several problems affecting STS are discussed concerning, e.g., multiplicity of universes. SGS overcomes these; but it faces further problems of its own, concerning, e.g., the very intelligibility of purely structural objects and relations. MS, in contrast, overcomes or avoids both sets of problems. Finally, it is argued that the modality of MS or a close cousin appears at crucial junctures in both STS and SGS, so that the above outcome is not obviously tendentious.
Keywords structuralism   WAYS
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/philmat/9.2.184
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,810
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Structuralism and the Notion of Dependence.Øystein Linnebo - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (230):59-79.
The Semantic Plights of the Ante-Rem Structuralist.Bahram Assadian - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-20.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
125 ( #40,452 of 2,202,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #35,429 of 2,202,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature