The Model of Plans and the Prospects for Positivism

Ethics 125 (1):152-181 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In Legality, Scott Shapiro builds his case for legal positivism on a simple premise: laws are plans. Recognition of that fact leads to legal positivism, Shapiro says, because the content of a plan is fixed by social facts. In this essay, I argue that Shapiro’s case for legal positivism fails. Moreover, I argue that we can learn important lessons about the prospects for positivism by attending to the ways in the argument fails. As I show, the flaws in Shapiro’s argument reveal structural problems with a family of prominent positivist views, including the one defended by Joseph Raz



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legality.Scott Shapiro (ed.) - 2011 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Legal Positivism and the Moral Aim Thesis.David Plunkett - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (3):563-605.
Theoretical Disagreement and the Semantic Sting.Dale Smith - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (4):635-661.
Legal positivism.Mario Jori (ed.) - 1992 - New York, NY: New York University Press.
The legacy of positivism.Michael Singer - 2005 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
In Defense of Hart.Matthew H. Kramer - 2013 - In Wil Waluchow & Stefan Sciaraffa (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. Oxford University Press. pp. 22.
Schmegality. [REVIEW]William A. Edmundson - 2011 - Jurisprudence 2 (1):273-291.
The Anarchist Official: A Problem for Legal Positivism.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2011 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36:89-112.
Dogmas and Distortions: Legal Positivism Defended.Matthew H. Kramer - 2001 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (4):673-701.


Added to PP

36 (#366,648)

6 months
1 (#862,753)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Scott Hershovitz
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

On the (in)significance of Hume’s Law.Samuele Chilovi & Daniel Wodak - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (2):633-653.
Legality’s Law’s Empire.Nevin Johnson - 2020 - Law and Philosophy 39 (3):325-349.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references